Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Some of Tarantino's Best

In honor of the release of "Inglourious Basterds", I thought I would post some of the greatest scenes from Tarantino films. This is not a "Best" list, just a random assortment of some great scenes. Of course, there are SO many more, so this is just a taste.









Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Race to Witch Mountain (PG)

Released: 2009
MPAA rating: PG
Run time: 1:38

I certainly didn't go into this expecting Shakespeare or Scorcese. I figured on a moderately entertaining family adventure with Dwayne Johnson (and, come on, who doesn't love "The Rock"). I could not have been more disappointed. Several Facebook friends have already disagreed, so maybe I just missed something. If it helps my case, my 9-year old daughter got bored as well. After a brief sequence setting up Johnson's character (Jack Bruno, a cab driver who used to drive for the mob), it moves right into the adventure. Two kids (AnnaSophia Robb and Alexander Ludwig) appear in his cab and offer him lots of cash for a ride. Against his better judgement, he accepts, finding himself transporting two aliens while being chased by the US Government and his former mob associates. The first half hour contains a ton of action with little to no set up so it becomes a bit too much and with action not grounded in any semblance of a story, it is surprisingly uninteresting. The Feds in pursuit are cookie-cutter characters you have seen in a thousand movies before this one. When they finally settle down a bit to catch you up on what is going on, you find you no longer even care. While Johnson is OK in basically a run-of-the-mill role for him, much of the remaining cast is just bad. Carla Gugino, as a scientist studying the possibility of extra-terrestrial life, is surprisingly bad, as she usually puts up good performances. I guess they just could not rise above the material. The plot is totally ripped off from "E.T." and a character ripped right out of "The Terminator" is thrown in for good measure. As I mentioned earlier, several people disagreed with me, but I just did not enjoy this at all.


Grade: D+

Trailer:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, August 17, 2009

Hannah Montana: The Movie

Released: 2009
MPAA rating: G

Run time: 1:42

This is one of those movies where any review, this humble writer included, is basically a waste of space. Its audience is its audience and they will see it no matter what any one says. Those who are not interested never will be. In any event, I'll take a shot. For those of you without tween girls, "Hannah Montana" is the alter-ego of Miley Stewart (Miley Cyrus), regular girl by day, pop star by night (aka "The Best of Both Worlds"). That is the basic premise of the TV show on which this movie is based. In the movie, Miley is leaning a little too heavy in the direction of "Hannah", losing her regular girl roots. Her dad (real-life dad Billy Ray Cyrus) decides it is time for her to disappear from the public eye for a while and brings her back to her hometown of Crowley Corners, Tennessee. Once there, she finds a town on the verge of losing a large plot of land to a developer who will build a mega-mall, destroying their small town feel. Of course, she also finds herself falling for ranch hand Travis Brody (Lucas Till). As she reconnects with her roots, she finds she needs to decide who she wants to be: Hannah Montana or Miley Stewart. The movie obviously has much better production value than the TV series and certainly a more serious storyline. They do find plenty of opportunity to mix in some of the slapstick comedy style from the show. Although the shows characters are represented, many of them are sort of done away with quickly. I was not all that crazy about the introduction of a publicist (Vanessa Williams), who has "Hannah" moving at a breakneck pace. On the show, you always get the impression that her dad takes care of all that. I guess they needed a protagonist to get her to need to get away from it all. Lots of music is sprinkled in and some of it is not that bad, especially "The Climb", which is a really good song, but is now becoming badly overplayed by radio. The fans will love this movie and the parents will not find themselves wanting to scream, so I guess that is high praise.


Grade: C

Trailer:




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

I Love You, Man


Released: 2009
MPAA rating: R
Run time: 1:45

Everywhere you turn, there is another romantic comedy hitting theaters. "I Love You, Man" introduces the concept of the "bro-mantic" comedy. Paul Rudd stars as Peter Klaven, a man on the verge of marriage who realizes he does not have any male friends that are close enough to actually ask to be his best man. So, he decides to get out there and try to start meeting men and doing manly things. He finds this process scarily similar to dating. So much so that, sometimes, the guys he meets actually think they ARE dating. Then, he meets Syndey Fife (Jason Segel), a sort of lewd, crude straight-talking guy who is oddly likable. They strike up quite a friendship which actually starts to interfere with his relationship with his fiance (Rashida Jones). I am huge fan of Paul Rudd, so I may be biased, but he is very funny in this movie. Jason Segel is also good and is better than he was in "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" (which he was also funny in). The movie has lots of male-bonding gags, along with possibly the funniest puke scene I have ever seen. The supporting cast members are also very good, including Jon Favreau and Jaime Pressley as a couple who is friends with his fiance. Favreau is the first to be charged with helping Rudd become a man and wants no part of the assignment. This is a very funny movie, although not one of the great all-time comedies. I definitely enjoyed it and had a good time watching it.


Grade: B-

Trailer:



Sunday, August 16, 2009

Bangkok Dangerous

Released: 2008
MPAA rating:
R
Run time: 1:39

I have a slight bias here in that I love hitman movies and I am sort of a Nic Cage fan, so factor that into your reading of this review. "Bangkok Dangerous" gives us the story of Joe (Nicholas Cage), a hitman for hire that works only through reputation: no one who hires him knows he is and he never knows who he is working for. As the movie opens, Joe's narration gives us the golden rules of his business:

I was taught four rules...
One: Don't ask questions. There is no such thing as right and wrong.
Two: Don't take an interest in people outside of work. There is no such thing as trust.
Three: Erase every trace. Come anonymous and leave nothing behind.
Four: Know when to get out. Just thinking about it means it's time. Before you lose your edge, before you become a target.

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that all of these rules will come into play before the movie is over. At this point in his career, he has already decided that the four hits in Bangkok will be his last job. When Joe falls for a local girl (Charlie Yeung) and befriends his errand boy, Kong (Shakrit Yamnarm), you can see the "rules" already eluding him. Of course, both of those relationships will be used against him at some point. As he moves through his targets, he finds himself also locked into a cat-and-mouse game with the mobster who hired him. The mobster does not like that he does not know who he hired and is trying to get to know Joe better. From Joe's standpoint, this is a major problem, setting up the climactic conflict of the film. Other than the voice-over narration by Cage, the movie is short on dialogue and lets the action and the tension tell the story. The "hitman at the end of his career" story line is really nothing new or ground-breaking, but I did find it to be an entertaining film. One crtitique is that, for a "cool, best-in-the-business" hitman, some of the hits we see are awfully sloppy and needlessly public. This just did not seem to fit this class of hitman. Also, the narration was very "breathy", almost obscene phone call breathy. Perhaps that's just Nic Cage's voice, but he seemed to be trying for a Clint Eastwood thing. Overall, an OK movie. I enjoyed it, but didn't love it.

Grade: C

Trailer:


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, August 15, 2009

The Haunting in Connecticut

Released: 2009
MPAA rating: PG-13
Run time: 1:42


First, I'll address the "Based on True Events" tagline: I don't buy any of it, even for a second. I actually dismissed that before I even dropped the DVD in. I approached this as a complete work of fiction. If I watched this with the "true story" mindset, this would be a very different review. Now, as a work of fiction, "The Haunting in Connecticut" works very well. The Campbell family is struggling with driving their son back and forth to a special hospital for cancer treatments. The mom, Sara Campbell (Virginia Madsen), decides they need to rent a home closer to the hospital because the long drive is just too much for their son. Of course, this poses a major financial hardship as they would now have to pay a mortgage and the rent. When looking for a home, she finds a large, beautiful home that's rent is surprisingly affordable. She decides she must take it, causing some tension between herself and her husband (Martin Donovan), who is already struggling to make ends meet. This first half of the movie which mostly deals with the emotional and financial struggles of dealing with a child with cancer is actually very well done. Unfortunately, having had experience in this area, I found the family's hardships rang very true. The loneliness, the conflict between keeping your job and taking care of your child, the "denial", the temptation to just descend into alcoholism to "get away from it all": It all hit very close to home. Once you get past that framework, you have Matt (Kyle Gallner), the son going through treatment, starts to see strange apparitions, which seem to be easily explained by his chemotherapy drugs. It is at this point that you get a pretty decent ghost story as they begin to find their house has secrets and some wayward spirits that need to be set free. As a work of fiction, I found this to be entertaining as the ghost story element was very suspenseful and creepy. The acting was good and the father's struggles with trying to keep it all together, sometimes unsuccessfully, hit the mark. While Virginia Madsen gets most of the screen time, with Kyle Gallner, Martin Donovan does a great job in his limited appearances. I definitely recommend this for fans of these haunting movies, just don't buy into the true story nonsense.


Grade: B


Trailer:




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Thrilla In Manila


Released: 2008 (British TV)
MPAA rating: None
Run time: 1:25


Whether you love boxing, hate boxing or simply don't care, this is a very compelling story of two driven, possibly obsessed, men on a collision course with history. "Thrilla in Manila", the all-time great fight between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier, has so much more to it that just a heavyweight fight for the title. This documentary details all of the pre-history and subtext of what many believe to be the greatest fight in boxing history. On the one hand, you have Muhammad Ali, born Cassius Clay and stripped of his license to fight when he refused to be drafted in the Vietnam War on religious grounds. On the other, you have Joe Frazier, who helped Ali out with some money while he was out of boxing and did every thing he could to help Ali get that license back. The tables turn when Ali is allowed to return, Frazier is the heavyweight champ, and Ali shows the brash confidence and fight-promoting genius that makes him "The Greatest". Unfortunately for Frazier, he is the target of Ali's trash-talking, being called an Uncle Tom, despite being raised in the mean streets of the blackest part of Philadelphia. Frazier took it all very personally and, to this day, does not forgive Ali for the things he said. This all builds up to a huge fight in Manila after two previous fights where each came away with a victory. This would be the one to decide who was the greatest of all time. The documentary does a great job capturing all of the drama and subtext of this fight and is a riveting film as it heads toward the fight itself with many of the key figures discussing what they saw and lived. The documentary is very "Frazier-centric" and tells the story mostly from his point of view, so Ali does not come off very well. I don't think any bit of it is inaccurate, but you can certainly tell who the filmmakers thought the "villain" of this story is. I really enjoyed this film and somewhat remember this fight when I was a kid and boxing was still a worldwide event. For a piece of sports, political and, oddly, race history, check it out.


Grade: A

Trailer:





Reblog this post [with Zemanta]